# China’s Campaign to Undermine U.S. Space Power - Canonical URL: https://americanfortitude.net/research/china-s-campaign-to-undermine-us-space-power - Category: National Security - Published: 2026-01-14T05:00:00+00:00 - Read Time: 12 min read - Tags: security, technology, foreign policy, china, space ## Summary China is executing a long-term strategy to challenge U.S. space dominance through cyber espionage, counterspace weapons, talent programs, and a tightly integrated civil-military space ecosystem. ## Full Content ## China’s Campaign to Undermine U.S. Space Power: Methods, Motivations, and Military Risks The People's Republic of China is executing an ambitious, multi-decade campaign to challenge and ultimately surpass US leadership in space. This effort combines technological development, cyber espionage, counterspace weapons programs, and strategic diplomacy to achieve what Beijing views as essential to its "national rejuvenation" by 2049. China's space program serves simultaneously as a military force multiplier, an economic growth engine, a diplomatic tool, and a source of national prestige. Through a combination of indigenous innovation, systematic technology theft, and its Military-Civil Fusion strategy, China has transformed from a space also-ran into the second most capable spacefaring nation—one that now poses fundamental challenges to American space superiority. ## I. China's Multi-Vector Approach to Undermining US Space Leadership ### A. Cyber Espionage Against Space Infrastructure China has conducted sustained cyber operations targeting US space programs, aerospace contractors, and research institutions for over two decades. These campaigns represent one of the most significant vectors through which Beijing has sought to narrow the technological gap with the United States. #### Documented Intrusions and Technology Theft Year Target Method Impact 2005 NASA networks, Lockheed Martin, Boeing "Titan Rain" hacking campaign Space Shuttle Discovery program data exfiltrated 2011 NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Chinese IP-based intrusion Hackers gained "full functional control" of key systems; 150 user credentials compromised 2008-2014 Boeing C-17, F-22, F-35 programs Phishing with PLA hackers 630,000+ files stolen; designs transferred to PLA General Staff Headquarters 2018 NASA JPL, Goddard, Navy, Energy Dept. APT10 campaign 100,000+ Navy personnel records; space/satellite technology stolen 2017-2021 NASA aerospace engineers Spear-phishing by Wu Song Targeted NASA software including CBAero used for aerospace engineering In 2011, NASA Inspector General Paul K. Martin testified before Congress that hackers traced to Chinese IP addresses had gained "full system access" to Jet Propulsion Laboratory computers and could "modify, copy, or delete sensitive files" or "upload hacking tools to steal user credentials" [8]. The attackers compromised accounts of "the most privileged JPL users," gaining what Martin described as "full functional control" of critical systems [8]. The APT10 hacking group, associated with China's Ministry of State Security, infiltrated NASA's Goddard Space Center and Jet Propulsion Laboratory alongside dozens of other US entities, stealing "hundreds of gigabytes of sensitive data" related to aviation, space, and satellite technology [24]. FBI Director Christopher Wray declared in 2018 that "No country poses a broader, more severe long-term threat to the United States than China" [24]. More recently, Wu Song, a 39-year-old engineer employed by the state-owned Aviation Industry Corporation of China, was indicted in 2024 for a years-long spear-phishing campaign targeting NASA employees and university researchers to obtain restricted aerospace software, including configuration-based aerodynamics tools designated "U.S. release only" [7]. ### B. Talent Recruitment and Technology Transfer Programs The Thousand Talents Program (TTP) represents a systematic effort by Beijing to recruit overseas experts who can transfer critical knowledge to China. By 2017, over 7,000 "high-end" scientists and researchers had been recruited under TTP, including dozens of Nobel laureates [22]. FBI analyses indicate that TTP participants have contributed to Chinese projects in "wind tunnel design and advanced lasers," directly tied to aerospace and defense applications [22]. The program operates through a "dual affiliation model" where recruited scholars maintain access to US laboratories, equipment, and funding while simultaneously conducting parallel research in China—often without disclosing these arrangements to US authorities [22]. One TTP contract offered a prominent US professor $50,000 per month plus $1.5 million for a research laboratory in China [22]. In return, participants are expected to conduct research, train students, apply for patents, and advance key projects for Chinese institutions—effectively creating "shadow labs" that mirror their American research [22]. The strategic impact extends beyond immediate technology transfer. Under China's Military-Civil Fusion policy, civilian research is systematically shared with defense sectors, meaning knowledge harvested from US programs can directly enhance PLA capabilities in areas including advanced materials, drones, AI, and other dual-use technologies [22]. ### C. Counterspace Weapons Development China has developed a comprehensive arsenal of counterspace capabilities designed to degrade or destroy US space assets during a potential conflict. The 2007 anti-satellite (ASAT) test marked China's formal entry into space weaponization and remains a defining moment in the militarization of space. #### China's ASAT Test Timeline and Capabilities System Type Capability Status SC-19/DN-1 Direct-ascent kinetic kill Destroyed satellite at 865 km altitude Operational since 2007 DN-2 Direct-ascent kinetic kill Targets medium Earth orbit satellites Tested 2013 DN-3 Direct-ascent kinetic kill Extended range capabilities In development Ground-based lasers Directed energy Dazzle/blind satellite sensors Deployed Electronic warfare Radio frequency jamming GPS/communications disruption Operational Shijian series Co-orbital inspector/weapon Proximity operations, satellite grappling Operational The 2007 test created the worst debris-generating event on record, producing at least 2,087 trackable pieces of debris—far surpassing the previous record of 713 pieces—and an estimated 35,000 fragments down to 1 centimeter in size [23]. Much of this debris will remain in orbit for centuries, increasing collision risk by 37% [23]. Chief of Space Operations General B. Chance Saltzman, who commanded the 614th Space Operations Squadron at the time of the 2007 test, has described it as a "pivot point" in space operations: "Instead of a test, it had been a demonstration of capability—a destructive test that created a debris field" [1]. Beyond kinetic weapons, China is developing laser-based systems capable of damaging satellite optics and sensors without creating debris [20]. ### D. Dual-Use "Inspector" Satellites Perhaps most concerning are China's co-orbital satellites that can approach, inspect, and potentially interfere with other nations' space assets. The Shijian-21 (SJ-21) satellite, launched in 2021, demonstrated the capability to grapple and tow another satellite in January 2022—officially framed as "space debris mitigation" but understood by US officials as a potential weapon system [9]. US Space Command commander General James Dickinson warned Congress that spacecraft like SJ-21 represent "part of an effort by China to seek 'space superiority through space and space-attack systems'" [6]. He specifically noted: "Space-based robotic arm technology could be used in a future system for grappling other satellites" [6]. In 2025, China appeared to conduct the world's first satellite refueling operation in geosynchronous orbit when SJ-21 and SJ-25 conducted "rendezvous and proximity operations with multiple close approaches" [9] [28]. ## II. Why Space Dominance Is Central to China's Long-Term Plans ### A. The 2027, 2035, and 2049 Strategic Milestones China's space ambitions are inextricably linked to its broader national strategy articulated through three critical milestones: Target Year Goal Space Implications 2027 "Significant progress" on information warfare capabilities; capability to invade Taiwan if necessary Complete C5ISRT infrastructure; field comprehensive satellite constellations for ISR and targeting 2035 PLA modernization "basically complete" Establish International Lunar Research Station basic model; achieve space parity with US 2049 "World-class military" matching US capabilities Full lunar exploitation; Mars exploration; comprehensive space dominance The ultimate goal, announced at the 19th Party Congress in 2017, is to transform the PLA into a "world-class" military by 2049—the centennial of Communist Party rule [29]. As one analysis concluded: "This very likely means developing a military that is at least equivalent to the United States and some of its Western partners. In terms of capabilities, the PLA of 2049 should be expected to be able to deploy forces across all domains globally to protect Chinese interests" [5]. ### B. Military-Civil Fusion: The Engine of Space Development China's Military-Civil Fusion (MCF) strategy eliminates traditional barriers between civilian research and military applications, creating a unified national effort to advance space capabilities. The State Department describes MCF as "an aggressive, national strategy" designed to "develop the most technologically advanced military in the world" through "the elimination of barriers between China's civilian research and commercial sectors and its military and defense industrial sectors" [19]. Under MCF, every commercial satellite, every academic research project, and every private space company in China potentially contributes to PLA capabilities. As Clayton Swope of CSIS testified: "Every new space technology, skill, and industrial capability acquired by the PRC will be used to provide the People's Liberation Army a battlefield advantage, as well as power civilian and commercial innovation and economic growth in China" [11]. The practical implications are stark. China's emerging commercial space sector—with 37 satellite manufacturing plants commissioned and 13 under construction as of April 2025—operates under this framework [11]. Combined, these facilities could produce over 4,000 satellites annually, rivaling SpaceX's production capacity [11]. ### C. BeiDou: Eliminating Dependence on American Infrastructure The completion of China's BeiDou Navigation Satellite System in 2020 represented a strategic watershed. The system's origins trace to the 1995-1996 Taiwan Strait Crisis, when an unexpected disruption in GPS caused the PLA to lose track of ballistic missiles fired over the strait. A PLA colonel recalled: "It was a great shame for the PLA… an unforgettable humiliation. That's how we made up our mind to develop our own global navigation and positioning system, no matter how huge the cost" [25]. BeiDou provides China with independent precision-guided munition capability, real-time military command and control, enhanced coercive leverage, and strategic exports [25] [25]. ### D. The Lunar Frontier: Resources and Geopolitical Positioning China's lunar program represents perhaps its most ambitious long-term space initiative. The International Lunar Research Station (ILRS), led by China with Russia as co-lead, aims to establish a permanent presence at the Moon's south pole by 2035, with an expanded network by 2050 [13]. The strategic importance extends beyond scientific prestige. Lunar resources—particularly helium-3 and rare earth elements—could transform global energy and technology markets. Helium-3 holds immense potential as fuel for nuclear fusion reactors and is valued at approximately $20 million per kilogram [4]. China's Chang'e-5 mission discovered a new helium-3-containing mineral, Changesite-(Y), marking a significant step toward resource exploitation [4] [15]. As one analysis warned: "A Chinese monopoly on this element would grant Beijing unprecedented economic and strategic leverage over global technology and energy markets, ultimately enabling the Chinese Communist Party to further push illiberal values via soft power" [4]. Beyond resources, there are concerns that China could replicate its South China Sea tactics in space—establishing de facto territorial claims under the guise of "safety zones" around ILRS infrastructure [4]. ### E. Global Space Infrastructure Diplomacy China is systematically embedding itself in the space programs of developing nations through a comprehensive "turnkey" approach that includes satellite design, manufacturing, launches, training, and ground infrastructure. A January 2026 CSIS report found that China has established ground stations across South America, Africa, and the Arctic, including facilities in Kiruna (Sweden), Neuquén (Argentina), and expanding presence in Namibia [12] [27]. These stations serve dual purposes: eliminating "blind spots" in China's global tracking network and creating long-term dependencies that provide diplomatic leverage [27]. As CSIS analyst Kari Bingen observed: "Beijing is offering a 'turnkey' space solution to the Global South—providing satellites, launch services, and ground infrastructure. In doing so, they are not just exporting technology; they are exporting a dependency that grants China access to sensitive geographic locations that could be operationalized during a conflict" [27]. ## III. The Taiwan Contingency and Space Warfare Space capabilities are central to China's plans for potential military action against Taiwan. The PLA views counterspace operations as essential for deterring and countering US military intervention in a regional conflict. ### China's Space-Enabled Kill Chain China has constructed what Lt. Gen. Douglas Schiess calls a "kill chain" for targeting US forces "at greater distances than we've ever seen," with space assets as the critical enabler [17]. As of July 2025, China operates more than 1,189 satellites—a 927% increase since 2015—with over 500 dedicated to ISR capabilities including optical, multispectral, radar, and radio frequency sensors [17]. The Yaogan-41 satellite, launched in December 2023, provides continuous surveillance of the Pacific and Indian Oceans from geostationary orbit, potentially enabling China to "identify and track car-sized objects throughout the entire Indo-Pacific region" [11]. This capability puts "at risk numerous U.S. and allied naval and air assets operating in the region" [11]. ## IV. US Response and the Competitive Landscape ### A. The Wolf Amendment: Isolation Strategy Since 2011, the Wolf Amendment has prohibited NASA from bilateral cooperation with Chinese government or China-affiliated organizations without explicit congressional approval and FBI certification [26] [16]. While intended to prevent technology transfer and signal disapproval of human rights practices, critics argue it has "neither discouraged Chinese space ambitions nor altered China's behavior"—instead "only muddled our relationship with China and created an opening for a challenger to NASA's leadership role in space exploration" [16]. ### B. Space Force Readiness The US Space Force, entering 2026 "amid escalating threats from China and Russia," faces what Defense News describes as "a pivotal year as it transitions to full-spectrum warfighting" [18]. Chief of Space Operations General Saltzman has declared: "The Space Force will do whatever it takes to achieve space superiority" [18]. The US-China Economic and Security Review Commission recommends either increasing or reallocating annual funding, echoing Space Force leaders who say the service's budget "will need to double or triple in the coming years" [3]. ## V. Strategic Implications and Assessment ### A. The Balance of Space Power The United States remains, "by most metrics, the most consequential nation in space," but China is "motivated to close the gap and has demonstrated through its actions, measured over decades, that it wants to win" [11]. China's advantages include a unified national strategy, manufacturing scale-up, counterspace capabilities, and strategic focus on Moon and Mars programs [11] [21]. ### B. The Fundamental Challenge As the U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission concluded: "China is aggressively positioning itself as a global leader in space technology and exploration, seeking to reshape international governance, influence standards, and displace the United States as the world's premier space power" [18]. As Edward Teller testified in 1963, "in a race for knowledge we will win. But in a race in which we are not running or running half-heartedly we have been losing and we will continue to lose" [11]. ### References - ↩ Air & Space Forces Magazine. (2023, January 12). Saltzman: China's ASAT test was 'pivot point' in space operations. - ↩ Air & Space Forces Magazine. (2024, July 14). Saltzman: China's anti-satellite weapons are 'compounding problem'. - ↩ Air & Space Forces Magazine. (2025, November 23). Report: Space Force needs more funding, training to counter China. - ↩ American Foreign Policy Council. (2025, December 3). How China could turn the moon into the next South China Sea. - ↩ Army University Press. (2023, September 5). Three dates, three windows, and all of DOTMLPF-P. Military Review. - ↩ Asia Times. (2021, November 7). Space Force tracks Shijian-21 satellite 'companion'. - ↩ Bank Info Security. (2025, February 10). US indicts Chinese national for phishing for NASA tech. - ↩ BBC News. (2012, March 7). Hackers had 'full functional control' of Nasa computers. - ↩ Breaking Defense. (2025, June). Chinese sats appear to be attempting first-ever on-orbit refueling, sat tracking firms say. - ↩ Center for Strategic and International Studies. (2023, February 28). Survey of Chinese espionage in the United States since 2000. - ↩ Center for Strategic and International Studies. (2025, April 11). Strategic trajectories: Assessing China's space rise and the risks to US leadership. - ↩ Center for Strategic and International Studies. (2026, January 14). In China's orbit: Beijing's space diplomacy in the Global South. - ↩ China National Space Administration. (2025, April 23). International Lunar Research Station attracts more partners: CNSA. - ↩ China National Space Administration. (2025, October 6). China's Chang'e-6 sheds first light on evolution history of moon's far side. - ↩ China Science News. (2024, June 2). More than 70 scientific achievements published on studies of lunar samples. ECNS. - ↩ Defense 360. (2020, November 30). Bad idea: The Wolf Amendment (limiting collaboration with China in space). - ↩ Defense News. (2025, September 25). China remains No. 1 threat in space: Space Force general. - ↩ Defense News. (2026, January 4). Space warfare in 2026: A pivotal year for US readiness. - ↩ U.S. Department of State. (2020). Military-Civil Fusion (MCF) strategy. - ↩ Indian Military Review. (2025, May 5). China's ASAT capabilities. - ↩ Institute for Security and Development Policy. (2025, April 29). Military-civil fusion is a key Chinese strategy with long-term implications. - ↩ IXN Dispatch. (2025, May 1). China's Thousand Talents Program (TTP) and counterespionage implications. - ↩ Kelso, T. S. (2007). Analysis of the 2007 Chinese ASAT test and the impact of its debris on the space environment. AMOS Technical Conference Proceedings. - ↩ Los Angeles Times. (2018, December 19). Chinese hackers charged with stealing data from Navy, JPL and dozens of other victims. - ↩ National Defense University Press. (2022, April 13). BeiDou: China's GPS challenger takes its place on the world stage. - ↩ New Space Economy. (2024, March 17). The Wolf Amendment: Restricting U.S.-China space cooperation. - ↩ Satnews. (2026, January 14). U.S. officials monitor expansion of China's global satellite ground infrastructure. - ↩ South China Morning Post. (2025, July 13). China's Shijian satellite pair appears to dock in orbit for historic refuelling mission. - ↩ South China Morning Post. (2025, August 31). China's military has made a dramatic about-turn. The world is watching.